Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
South Tyneside Stop the War / Re: Notes towards a new anti-war 'epic' ...
« Last post by Phil Talbot on November 13, 2025, 12:38:20 AM »
Plaigurism?/Quotation?/Recyclin’?/...etc ...

Living in a (tick) B.O.x: ‘.... i’m Built 4 “strength” & made ma(I)d with 100% recycled “content” ...’

Mad “king” ‘sa sa sa(d) sa(yingtong) by the C.see.sea(?):

‘No, no, no, no! Come, let’s away to prison.
We two alone will sing like birds i’ the cage:
When thou dost ask me blessing, I’ll kneel down.
And ask of thee forgiveness: so we’ll live,
And pray, and sing, and tell old tales, and laugh
At gilded butterflies, and hear the poor rogues
Talk of court news; and we’ll talk with them too, —
Who loses and who wins; who’s in, who’s out: —
And take upon us the mystery of things,
As if we were God’s spies: and we’ll wear out,
In a wall’d prison, packs and sects of great ones,
That ebb and flow by th’ moon.’

2
For Your Information / Britain needs war: Why London can’t afford peace in Ukraine
« Last post by Roger on November 12, 2025, 05:42:40 PM »
Britain needs war: Why London can’t afford peace in Ukraine
RT - Daily news by RT / Nov 12, 2025 at 12:29 PM
2 Companies
The UK’s power machine runs on war, and conflict in Eastern Europe
is its new fuel
When The Guardian reported last week that the British Army is preparing for operations in Ukraine, it was easy to treat it as another piece of saber-rattling. But Keir Starmer’s declaration that “we will not back down until Ukraine wins” is not a slogan; it is the essence of British strategy. For London, conflict is not a failure of diplomacy but a survival mechanism. War conceals economic stagnation, fills political vacuums, and restores an international relevance the country has been losing for years.
Britain
emerged from Brexit in a weakened state. The EU market was largely gone, economic growth barely existed, inflation ran above 8%, the National Health Service buckled under pressure, and more than 900,000 people left the country annually. A political system built on confidence and inherited prestige was now running on fumes. Yet while domestic life sagged, the British state was hardening.
Unlike continental powers, Britain is not structured around a single center but as a horizontal web of institutions: intelligence agencies, bureaucracies, military commands, banks, universities, the monarchy. Together they form a machine designed for strategic survival. When crises come, this network does not collapse. It feeds on instability, turns adversity into leverage, and converts decline into opportunity. After empire came the City of London. After colonies came offshore accounts and loyal networks. After Brexit came a new military cordon around Russia in northern and eastern Europe. Britain has always known how to turn disaster into capital.
The Ukraine
conflict, which London helped provoke, has become its biggest opportunity in decades. Since 2022 the country has lived, politically and institutionally, in wartime conditions. The 2025 Strategic Defense Review openly calls for readiness for “high-intensity warfare” and proposes lifting defense spending to 2.5% of GDP, around £66 billion ($87 billion) a year. Military spending has already risen by £11 billion. Orders to defense firms have jumped by a quarter. For the first time since 1945, a British industrial strategy describes the military-industrial complex as an “engine of growth.”
Thirty years of deindustrialization left Britain dependent on redistribution. Where manufacturing once stood, only finance remained. Now the financial sector can no longer sustain the government’s ambitions. Into that vacuum steps the arms industry. BAE Systems and Thales UK have secured contracts worth tens of billions, insured by London banks through UK Export Finance. The fusion of “guns and pounds” has produced an economy where conflict, not commerce, becomes the measure of national success.
Read more  The battle the world is watching, but few understand: What’s really going on in Pokrovsk?
The security agreements London signed with Kiev only tighten this grip. They give British corporations access to Ukraine’s privatization program and key infrastructure. Ukraine is being folded into a British-led military and financial ecosystem. Not as a partner, but as a dependency. Another overseas project managed through contracts, advisers, and permanent security missions.
Far from acting as a supportive ally, Britain now conducts the conflict. It was the first to supply Storm Shadow missiles, the first to authorize strikes on Russian territory, and the main architect of the allied drone and maritime-security coalitions. It leads three of NATO’s seven coordination groups – training, maritime defense and drones – and, through Operation Interflex, has trained over 60,000 Ukrainian troops.
British involvement is not symbolic. It is operational. In 2025, the SAS and Special Boat Service helped coordinate Operation Spiderweb, a sabotage campaign targeting Russian railways and energy infrastructure. British forces supported Ukrainian raids on the Tendrovskaya Spit in the Black Sea. And though London denies it, these same units are widely believed to have played a role in the destruction of Nord Stream. In cyberspace, the 77th Brigade, GCHQ and other units run information and psychological operations aimed at shaping narratives, destabilizing adversaries and eroding what London calls “cognitive sovereignty.”
Meanwhile Britain is drawing its own map of Europe. A new northern belt – from Norway to the Baltic states – is being built outside EU authority. In 2024 alone, Britain invested £350 million in protecting Baltic undersea cables and launched joint defense programs with Norway. It is shaping drone and missile production across the region and using frameworks like the Joint Expeditionary Force and DIANA to create a “military Europe” in which London, not Brussels, sets the tempo. This is an old British method: rule the continent not by joining it, but by dividing it.
Read more  How the West dismantled the last pillars of nuclear stability
A stable peace in Ukraine would shatter this architecture. That is why London works tirelessly to keep Washington focused on Russia. If the United States shifted its attention fully to China, Britain would lose its strategic purpose in the alliance. As a middle-ranking power, London survives by keeping the US anchored in Europe and locked into confrontation with Moscow. Any thaw between Washington and Russia threatens Britain far more than it threatens continental Europe.
This explains why Donald Trump’s early peace rhetoric in 2025 – his hints at “territorial compromise” – was met in London with alarm. The British government responded instantly: a new £21.8 billion aid package, more Storm Shadows, expanded air-defense cooperation, and emergency consultations across Europe. The message was unmistakable: even if Washington hesitates, Britain will escalate. And within weeks Trump’s tone changed. Diplomacy faded. Talk of “Anchorage peace” disappeared. In its place came threats of Tomahawks and loose comments about resuming nuclear testing. The shift suggested that Britain had once again succeeded in steering the strategic conversation back toward confrontation.
For Britain’s elite, war is not a catastrophe. It is a method of maintaining order and preserving the system. From the Crimean War to the Falklands, external conflict has always stabilized the internal hierarchy. Today’s Britain behaves no differently. Though weaker than it has ever been, it appears strong because it knows how to turn vulnerability into the basis of its foreign policy.
This is why the war in Ukraine continues. Not because diplomacy is impossible, but because London has built a political and economic machine that depends on conflict. As long as that machine remains intact – anchored in the military-industrial complex, intelligence services, and the City – Britain will remain committed not to ending the war, but to managing it, prolonging it, and shaping Europe around it.
And the war will end only when that machine stops functioning.
This article was first published in Kommersant, and was translated and edited by the RT team.
3
South Tyneside Stop the War / Re: Notes towards a new anti-war 'epic' ...
« Last post by Phil Talbot on November 10, 2025, 01:24:21 AM »
... So having said, a while he stood, expecting
their Universal Shout and High Applause
to Phil/Fill(fall)his ears, when (but) contrary he hears
on all sides
from innumerable U.N.versal tongues
a 'dismal' universal 'HIss' (ba!shucks!?) ...
4
I don't think/feel you/U have quite/quit have quiet/quite got(ten/10) 'I.T./it' yet, Roger ... p'st ...
5
 Starmer's "coalition of the willing" in London   Starmer's Desperate and Dangerous Attempts to Lead Europe in NATO's Unjust Proxy War with Russia

Workers' Weekly

https://www.rcpbml.org.uk/wwie-25/ww25-25/ww25-25-01.htm

Demonstration opposing the London arms show, September 9, 2025 - photo:PBI

On October 24, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer convened in London yet another desperate meeting of the "coalition of the willing" [1] with European powers to discuss the failing state of NATO's unjust proxy war with Russia in Ukraine which has lasted for nearly four years. It was trailed right up to the last moment that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, the Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof, as well as the NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, "are all expected to attend the meeting in person at the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office today". The press release also claimed that "a further 20 leaders are expected to dial into the call". However, in the event the meeting was virtual, apart from the presence of President Zelenskyy, as stated in a later communique dated October 24, looking as if the intended participants were not so willing to be seen with Starmer. President Zelenskyy himself met King Charles at Windsor Castle, demonstrating the state's use of the King as part of its arsenal of "soft power".


Protests against the NATO Parliament, Dayton, Ohio - Photo:Hawkins

This vague government press release following the meeting [2] said: "Prime Minister and President Macron today co-chaired a virtual meeting of the Coalition of the Willing, attended by President Zelenskyy." The statement failed to mention Starmer's earlier claim that the "coalition of the willing" wanted to "step up the gifting of long-range capabilities" to Ukraine. However, the statement confirmed that the "coalition of the willing", particularly Britain, and France, want to occupy Ukraine themselves in any "ceasefire agreement" and state that "they confirmed that plans are in place to deploy a Multinational Force Ukraine once hostilities have ceased, with a view to help secure Ukraine's skies and seas and regenerate Ukraine's armed forces".

Whilst in a previous meeting of the "coalition of the willing" in London in March, Starmer had claimed that the summit was to "present a peace plan to US president Donald Trump", with this summit Starmer desperately tried to sell his plans for long-range weapons and dangerously escalating the conflict with Russia and his plans to occupy Ukraine with NATO forces. Reports earlier in the week said that the "coalition of the willing" talks "come after discussions between Volodymyr Zelensky and Mr Trump failed to result in the US supplying Tomahawk missiles and reports that the Ukrainian president faced pressure to accept Moscow's demands" to bring about a permanent peace deal proposed by Russia. A government press release from Downing Street claimed that the "coalition of the willing" are "global leaders" and represent the "international community". Starmer said that he "will urge leaders to act to take Russian oil and gas off the global market". He also went on to claim that it was in Britain's interest to steal Russian assets and supply long-range missiles to escalate the war. He said that Britain wants to "finish the job on Russian sovereign assets to unlock billions of pounds to fund Ukraine's defences, and step up the gifting of long-range capabilities". The statement also said that "the meeting comes as the Prime Minister announces acceleration of missile delivery programme to deliver 140 lightweight multirole missiles to Ukraine this winter, supporting UK jobs".

Starmer goes even further in saying that the whole of Britain's "plan for change" in the economy is about weapons. He declares: "UK's national security - the foundation of the Government's Plan for Change - starts in Ukraine." Thus the "UK missile building programme has been accelerated to deliver more than 100 extra air defence missiles ahead of schedule. The package forms part of the £1.6bn deal between UK industry and Ukraine in March to provide more than 5,000 lightweight multirole missiles (LMM) to support Ukraine's defence, creating 200 jobs and supporting 700 existing jobs at Thales in Belfast."

This further reveals that Britain and its EU allies are not serious about reaching a peace agreement with Russia but are insanely dedicated to escalating the war as before, even if the US will not. They continue to encourage the regime in Ukraine to fight Russia to the last Ukrainian. This is so even now when the situation for Ukraine gets worse on the battlefield and many of their experts tell them that the war is unwinnable. In fact, one of the primary aims of Britain, France and Germany alongside the US is to maintain the interest of the huge war industries and to occupy Ukraine themselves with their troops, navy and air force under the guise of "peace keepers" if they are forced to accept a peace deal and this is why they favour a "ceasefire" rather than a peace agreement with Russia. This is in line with the Starmer's government's plan to boost its military spending. Starmer had told the Commons in February that Britain would spend £13.4bn more on defence every year from 2027 boosting the spend to 2.5% of GDP by 2027. He also told Trump at a NATO meeting that Britain would commit to reach 3.5%, or even 5%, of GDP by 2035.

This has nothing to do with stimulating economic development, or meeting the growing needs of the British people for jobs and their needs in the economy. Rather it is to do with war - encouragement and escalation to war - where it becomes in Britain's interest to make sure that wars keep going as often and as long as possible to serve Britain's militarised economy. This only leads to a situation where the government and the war industries behind it demand the escalation of wars like the war in Ukraine and give their full support to Israel and arming Israel in its genocide against the Palestinians and blocking their recovery in their own lands by refusing to hold Israel to account. For this purpose Britain hosted the largest global weapons expo Defence and Security Equipment International[3] in London on September 8-12 with some 1,600 military companies and 51 companies from Israel, and more than 180 British companies exhibited in the ADS Pavilion alone - hosted by the UK's aerospace, defence, security, and space industry trade association (over 200 British companies overall).


War criminals road sign, London arms show, September 9, 2025

Starmer also claims that one of the aims of Britain and the EU powers is the defence of Ukraine's sovereignty. However, this principle that Starmer pretends to uphold cannot be sorted out by the US, Britain, France and Germany and other EU powers that have themselves interfered in and violated the sovereignty of Ukraine. Britain, Germany and France have also interfered and waged war against Russia and are doing so now by using Ukraine as their proxy to "inflict a strategic defeat on Russia", arming and assisting the war with logistics and weapons. Since 2013, Britain and the US have been training the Ukrainian military and incorporating known historical neo-Nazi forces into the army of Ukraine in order to expand their control eastwards against Russia. In 2014, there was Anglo/US active backing for these neo-Nazi forces to carry out a coup against the elected President of Ukraine and install a Ukrainian regime for their exclusive use against Ukraine's neighbour Russia.

In other words, the NATO powers have expanded into Ukraine in recent years and carried out one provocation after another against Russia in Ukraine. Since the 2014 Maidan coup, Britain and the US have encouraged the Kyiv regime to reject the Minsk accords that were peace agreements signed in Belarus by Ukraine and Russia, facilitated by the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) and supported by Germany and France through the Normandy Format, and later endorsed by the United Nations [4]. Since the conflict began, Britain has consistently encouraged Ukraine to reject any peace deal with Russia. Boris Johnson notoriously flew to Kyiv in April 2022, six weeks after the conflict started, to tell Kyiv that signing a peace agreement in Istanbul would lose Anglo-US backing [5].

Starmer's "coalition of the willing" is yet another desperate and dangerous attempt to lead Europe in NATO's unjust and failing proxy war in Ukraine. Whilst they now call for a "ceasefire", the British and the old powers of Europe are desperate that no permanent peace comes about between Russia and Ukraine and are attempting to escalate the conflict and sabotage any peace deal that is made with Ukraine and Russia. All along Britain has continued its warmongering role in escalating the Ukraine war and being the first to supply modern battle tanks, Storm Shadow missiles and now Starmer declares that he will "step up the gifting of long-range capabilities".

Starmer claims that the British economy and his "plan for change" must be based in prosecuting the Ukraine war and in further militarisation of the economy. This is such a dangerous and insane direction for any economy. As the TUC recently demonstrated, the organised workers reject rearmament as not being a suitable foundation for the economy. Starmer's plan for the military and armament industries cannot be a part of the solution to the war in Ukraine which Britain helped provoke and continues to arm and escalate, endangering a wider war in Europe and the world. This must be opposed! Sending British or NATO troops to Ukraine must be resisted as a further escalation of the conflict. A lasting peace between Ukraine and Russia must be supported. Britain's dangerous warmongering must be blocked. The anti-war movement must prevail!


Notes
1. The "coalition of the willing" is reported to have 33 participants across Europe and beyond. The term "coalition of the willing" is an echo, presumably deliberate, of the Anglo-US-led powers that participated in the criminal invasion and occupation of Iraq in 2003.

2. Press release - Chair's statement following 24 October Coalition of the Willing Leaders' meeting
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/chairs-statement-following-24-october-coalition-of-the-willing-leaders-meeting

3. Key facts about DSEI 2025:
" Location: ExCeL Centre, East London
" Dates: September 8-12, 2025
" Exhibitors: Over 1,600 companies from 50 countries, including 25 from Poland and 51 from Israel
" Attendees: More than 50,000 visitors, including delegations from over 90 countries
" Theme: "Preparing the Future Force"
" Scope: Featured everything from small arms and armoured vehicles to combat aircraft and warships
It ranks alongside IDEX in Abu Dhabi and Eurosatory in Paris as one of the top three global defence expos.

4.The Minsk accords were peace agreements aimed at ending the conflict in eastern Ukraine (Donbas region). They were signed in Minsk, Belarus, and negotiated primarily by the Trilateral Contact Group-which included Ukraine, Russia, and the OSCE (Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe). The process was supported by Germany and France through the Normandy Format, but they were not formal signatories.
There were two main agreements:
" Minsk I: Signed on September 5, 2014
" Minsk II: Signed on February 12, 2015
The United Nations Security Council did endorse the Minsk II agreement through Resolution 2202, adopted on February 17, 2015, giving it international backing.

5. Boris Johnson visited Kyiv during the early stages of the war in April 9, 2022. According to reporting from Ukrayinska Pravda, Johnson used that visit to discourage President Zelenskyy from pursuing peace negotiations with Russia. The paper claimed Johnson told Ukrainian officials that even if Ukraine was ready to sign a deal with Russia, the West - particularly the UK and US - was not. This reportedly influenced Kyiv to pull back from talks that had been progressing in Istanbul.
6
South Tyneside Stop the War / Re: Notes towards a new anti-war 'epic' ...
« Last post by Phil Talbot on October 29, 2025, 11:51:28 AM »
'my' 'basic/bay-sick\$ick-B.heigh' problem was: 'they' were to/too/2(plus2?=1234...?)'sure'(sic.)o'them_selfs/selves ... p.st ....
7
South Tyneside Stop the War / Re: Notes towards a new anti-war 'epic' ...
« Last post by Phil Talbot on October 29, 2025, 07:03:50 AM »
After (USA) Judge Clayton W. Horn, declaring/judging Allen Ginsberg’s HOWL to be NOT ‘lewd and obscene’: Life is not encased in one formula whereby everyone acts the same or conforms to a particular pattern. No two persons think alike. We are all made from the same mould, but in different patterns. Would there be any freedom of press or speech if one must reduce ... vocabulary to vapid innocuous euphemisms? Authors should be real in treating their subjects, and be allowed to express ideas in their own wordZ.
...
e.g.,A.G.(how-long how-lin’ out lines like?u2: ... ‘how long must i sing this song?{!}’
): “... a lost battalion of platonic conversationalists jumping down the stoops
off fire escapes off windowsills off ..
yacketayakking screaming vomiting whispering facts and memories
and anecdotes  and eyeball kicks and shocks of hospitals and
jails and wars,
whole intellects disgorged in total recall ...”
8
South Tyneside Stop the War / Re: Notes towards a new anti-war 'epic' ...
« Last post by Phil Talbot on October 26, 2025, 11:00:59 AM »
... unifying EPICS were ‘reduced’ to the fragmented & frag-men-ting 'battle songs' of, eg,  ...
... the civil war in former Yugoslavia ...
... crude, kitsch, divorced from reality ...
(... and sung in howling voices ... with screaming musical accompaniment ...)
... eg: “Who is the liar who says Serbia’s small?
She’s fought three wars and won them all!”
...
9
South Tyneside Stop the War / Re: Notes towards a new anti-war 'epic' ...
« Last post by Phil Talbot on October 12, 2025, 07:44:34 AM »
... ‘they’ were all(y/lie) looking for/4 some/suM. ‘form’ o’adVantaZege’ ?!
10
South Tyneside Stop the War / Re: Notes towards a new anti-war 'epic' ...
« Last post by Phil Talbot on October 09, 2025, 09:20:10 AM »
... when many/most English/British people heard/herd the (‘collectivizing’) word “Dunkirk” ... they thought of an army being rescued from a beach ... B.ng/being rescued by a small fleet of small boats ... orderly queues of (mostly) men wading into the sea ...
... that seemed to symboliZe all that was ‘best’ about U.K.G.B.&N.I....
... but(t) .... which, perhaps, had/has now been ‘lost’ for\4/‘ever’ ...
(... even (al)’though few had a clear idea of what ‘Dunkirk Spirit’ really “‘mean’T” ...

... ‘all things’ to ‘all people’ ..
... ‘P/platonic “I/...’id’Deals/IDEA(l)s ...)

... & when ‘he’ encountered the word/name “Dunkirk” ... all she/he thought-felt of was a ‘liver’ ... a ‘steaming’ stripped off blown a-part liver ... in a ‘ditch’ ...
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10