Author Topic: What Really Happened to MH370  (Read 4182 times)

nestopwar

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 842
    • View Profile
What Really Happened to MH370
« on: March 31, 2014, 07:47:08 AM »
What Really Happened to MH370
From: Mathaba Summary conclusion after analysis of all the known facts by communications, counter-terrorism, aviation experts


The facts in summary

MH370 took off from Kuala Lumpur direction Beijing and reached cruising altitude of 35,000 feet (Flight Level 350) over the South China Sea. At less than 5,000 feet above the sea, a second jet was flying, possibly another large Boeing.

The pilots on MH370 said good night to Malaysian air traffic control as they were leaving Malaysia's Flight Information Region (FIR) and about to enter into Vietnam FIR. At that point, they were now ready to relax with nothing to do, the aircraft on auto pilot.

The U.S. aircraft flying more than 30,000 feet below in order to have a line of sight strong very short wave communication signal necessary to take control of the MH370 Boeing 777 using it's remote radio control facility, now took control of MH370.

This is a well documented "feature" of modern Boeing passenger liners which has been the complaint and worry of some pilots, as it removes all control from them, and subjects them to total remote control of all functions of the aircraft "in case of terrorism incident".

They raised MH370 to 45,000 feet which is above the maximum allowed service level for Boeing 777's and at which altitude all occupants of the aircraft will become disoriented and pass out within minutes, and then die within minutes.

This is when another aircraft, as MH370 did not contact Vietnam Air Traffic Control (ATC) soon after signing off from Malaysia ATC, contacted MH370 on the VHF emergency channel, as is normal procedure in such cases.

The other pilot merely heard "mumbling" because the co-pilot answering the call, could not string coherent words together, as his head was giving way due to lack of oxygen.

At the same time, the rogue U.S. aircraft (let us say "CIA-MOSSAD", see accompanying story for the motives for this murderous plot), far down below and flying below radar, turned MH370 on a course almost directly South, to put MH370 on a straight line toward Antarctica.

MH370 would now continue, as a flying coffin, on a course, with or without live data transmission to Rolls Royce from her engines, but certainly pinging Inmarsat at least once an hour, until she would run out of fuel and plummet into the most remote, deep, rough ocean.

Meanwhile the U.S. hijacking aircraft far below, followed the same course for a while, maintaining check that MH370 remained at 45,000 feet and thus above the usual civilian radar monitoring limits, before heading off South West near the Malaysian-Thai border.

It then continued below radar level where it was witnessed by several credible reports, across Malaysia then turned west over the Andaman sea and onward to Diego Garcia, possibly being witnessed by inhabitants of neighboring Maldive Islands.

And that is why all reports, even those that are otherwise accurate both in mainstream controlled and free independent media, are making grave errors: they are trying to fit two different aircraft spotted on radar into one.

MH370 was always at 45,000 feet, and the other aircraft was generally below the radar level, although it could not always be due to the terrain along the Malaysia-Thailand border.

It is also possible, that the hijacking aircraft, not the remote controlled hijacked MH370, now a flying coffin, wanted to be deliberately witnessed across Northern Malaysia and then heading west on a course toward Somalia, to throw any investigation off trail.

Meanwhile, Inmarsat data was being ignored by all parties, including China which is just as guilty if not more so than Malaysia, for China has military satellites in the skies, and also should have considered the Inmarsat data.

This author, a communication specialist, considered this data within days of MH370 going missing, and already drew the conclusion that MH370 would be at the end, or beyond the end, of the ping corridor released by Inmarsat, at the end of its fuel consumption.

It was therefore published on Mathaba, though a little concealed within other articles, as to the location that should be searched. It was only weeks later, that this location was searched, and only after satellite images showed some of the wreckage.

However, due to the rough nature of the sea in the Southern Indian Ocean, the chances of ever recovering the "black box" are next to none, and if so, only by the U.S. using a remote controlled submarine, and then the U.S. will be the one releasing whatever it wants.

See article linked below (which is a public one and can be shared) on why MH370 was sent to a deep grave. That article is an edited version of another publication, which source will not be given because the other article is spoiled by other gross errors.


 The Motive For MH370 Remote Hijack: Freescale Semiconductors Posted: 2014-03-27
From: Mathaba
Those who hijacked MH370 (for how it was done, see the article in the subscribers-only Mathaba Gold area) had a clear motive: to murder many of the passengers on board who were able to supply China with crucial military application technology

The below is an edited version of an article by Yoichi Shimatsu, a Hong Kong-based science writer, former editor of The Japan Times Weekly and a founding faculty member of journalism schools in Hong Kong and Beijing, edited because it contained gross errors (some of which are cleared up in our Mathaba Gold article here).

The question tormenting millions worldwide is "Why"? What could be the motive behind the radio-controlled hijacking and deliberate murder of all on board Malaysian Airlines flight 370?

Among the 200-plus passengers bound for Beijing, the target group for the hijack is narrowing down to 20 tech employees working for Freescale Semiconductors, based in Austin, Texas. Among these programmers and systems designers are 12 Malaysians and 8 citizens of mainland China.

The company is no newcomer but has long-time connections in East Asia, as the former design subsidiary of Motorola, which once dominated the Asian communications market in the postwar era. Freescale has design centers in Kuala Lumpur and in China, including Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, Chengdu and Suzhou.

Besides its lucrative production of microchips for automotive components, Freescale has extensive contracts with the U.S. military, producing wafers and circuits for navigation, periscopes, electronic targeting, self-guided missiles and other weapons systems that require intelligence controls.

Any defense-related company at the nerve center of Pentagon hardware is bound to attract the attention of weapons designers from both adversarial and allied nations upgrading their military capability. Japan, France and the UK, along with Russia, China and Iran, all want the leading edge that contractors like Freescale provide.

What technological innovation would prompt the Pentagon's military intelligence agencies to electronically interdict a civilian airliner in mid-flight, while disposing of the collateral passengers as shark bait?

Ultra-small Microcontoller

In February 2013, Freescale unveiled the Kinesis KL02, the world's smallest microcontroller, measuring 1.9 mm by 2mm and containing RAM, ROM and a clock. The company brags that the device is so small that it can be swallowed for medical uses, such as releasing drugs according to prescription schedule or directing micro-surgery.

Tiny though it may be, the micro-controller is the key to next-generation warfare based on self-guidance, tactical versatility and hierarchy of commands, in short, an adaptive thinking weapon that can outsmart foes. Potential applications include:

- Drones smaller than a fly, either as remotes or autonomously, on surveillance missions or to deliver biowarfare packets, for example, lab-cloned viruses or toxic drugs. Their light weight means longer flying periods or even indefinite hovering time if solar-powered.

- Injectable implants to insert a human-machine interface, for example, a targeting system attached to the optic nerve, rendering Google glasses obsolete. Bionic implants could be implanted in nerves of the limbs to control battery-powered prosthetics, realizing the Pentagon's dream of a human-centered robotic warrior, known to anime fans as "meka".

- Maneuverable micro-satellites and mini-submarines that can be operated as drones or act independently to track and hunt larger weapons systems, spy satellites too small to be detected by ground telescopes, and orbiting warheads containing chemical, biological or nuclear materials.

Strategic Versus Commercial Interest

The series code of Kinesis KL02 stands for Version 2 made in Kuala Lumpur, which is the capital of Malaysia. This core of America's next-gen weapons systems was developed overseas, in a Muslim-preponderant country economically allied with China, Russia and Japan and often at odds with US foreign policy. Therefore, an upcoming round of testing in China, and possible manufacture of Version 3 in Beijing, was a prospect that the Pentagon agencies, especially the NSA, the US Air Force's Space Command and DARPA, had to stop by any means available.

As Freescale Malaysia prepared to test Kinesis at its sister research labs in Beijing and Tianjin, alarm bells were sounding at the DARPA-funded Charles Stark Draper Laboratory in Cambridge, Massachusetts. That leading weapons-research facility was created during World War II to build navigation systems and bomb sights stabilized against turning and vibrations by inertia. It has since moved on to microchips for every military application, including inertial guidance for ballistic missiles, communications, GPS, intelligent targeting systems, orbital piloting for the International Space Station and, under the cover of "biomedical", the transhuman super-soldier program.

The release of Kinesis exposed the Pentagon's dilemma over dual-use technology, which can garner vast profits through civilian applications, as shown by GPS for cars and smartphones, yet threaten to wipe out America's technological lead in warfare. The choice of whether to down on a new technology is not limited to Pentagon insiders and generals, since defense contractors and elite corporate executives are also involved.

Dirty Work for Israel

In the case of Freescale, the executive management and several veteran board members are connected with the Carlyle Group, which favors civilian commercialization of defense-related technologies to benefit its investment partners, including George Bush Senior and several retired defense secretaries.

On the other hand, Freescale is financially contolled by private-equity group Blackstone, with major investors including the Rothschild banking family and several of its business partners. As top financiers behind the Zionist movement, the pro-Israeli interest is to prevent miniaturized robotic weapons from falling into the hands of Iran and its allies Hezbollah and Hamas. Micro-vehicles, self-guided and with tactical flexibility, swarming against Israeli cities, ports and airfields would be a nightmare for the Israel Defense Force.

Therefore, the defenders of the Jewish state had to take action. Better to kill 200 Malaysian enemies and Chinese nobodies than to harm one hair on the head of any of the Chosen People. And thus, the order came down from the Red Shield, the House of Rothschild, to their neocon subordinates inside the Pentagon: Stop Flight 370 at any cost to America's reputation.

The New Boss

Thus, in November, just a few months before the MH370 hijack, Freescale seated a new member on its Board of Directors. Joanne Maguire is an executive with three decades of experience in the Lockheed Martin Space Division. She studied electrical engineering at University of Michigan and UCLA, where she earned her master's degree. She was invited to the Harvard Program for Senior Executives in National and International Security. Caltech honored her with the Karmann Wings Award and she received the Peter Teets Award from the National Defense Industrial Association.

As the very embodiment of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), Maguire was the ideal choice to serve as watchdog against the corporate profiteers at Freescale.
 
« Last Edit: March 31, 2014, 06:30:46 PM by nestopwar »

nestopwar

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 842
    • View Profile
Re: What Really Happened to MH370
« Reply #1 on: March 31, 2014, 06:38:03 PM »
Boeing 777 Could Have Been Reprogrammed From the Ground


Added by Alan Milner on March 18, 2014.
Saved under Alan Milner, Malaysia, Technology, World
Tags: boeing 777




Boeing 777The Boeing 777 could have been reprogrammed from the ground, according to whispers overheard on military channels, increasing speculation that the missing aircraft was taken for a future terrorist mission. Chatter in security circles is focused on the role of the autopilot controls in the diversion of the aircraft from its original flight plan.

The continuing mystery concerning the whereabouts of the missing Malaysian Airlines Flight 370 has triggered intense conversations in certain circles about whether the Boeing aircraft could have been taken over from the ground. The Boeing 777 is a “fly-by-wire” aircraft, which means that all of the aeronautical functions of the plane are controlled through digital electronics, rather than hydraulic controls.

Evidence that the aircraft could have been controlled remotely are self-evident. The United States has deployed drone aircraft all over the world to perform both surveillance and fire missions controlled by pilots half a world away from the targets being surveilled and attacked by their drones.Drones are designed from the ground up to be controlled remotely and so, it turns out, is the Boeing 777, which is equipped with an emergency intervention system that would allow a remote operator to land the aircraft from the ground simply by manipulating the autopilot. This has never been done, according to aviation experts, but it is within the realm of possibility.

According to the information that was initially released by investigators, Flight 370 climbed to 45,000 feet and stayed there briefly before descending to 25,000 feet. The service ceiling for this aircraft is 43,100 feet. One of the theories about the odd behavior of the aircraft was that someone climbed to 45,000 to trigger cabin decompression and render the passengers of the aircraft unconscious…or dead. The problem with that theory is that the cockpit does not have a separate air flow system from the rest of the aircraft so that rendering the passengers and crew unconscious would also render the pilots unconscious as well.

The fact that the aircraft then descended to 25,000 seemed to indicate that there was someone on board who was still in control of the aircraft, but that may not be the case if the aircraft was being controlled remotely. The technology clearly exists to permit someone to fly the Boeing remotely. The key question, which engineers are now researching, is whether it might be possible for someone on the ground to gain control of the aircraft through one of the 14 sensor contact points on the aircraft to reprogram the autopilot.

Some security analysts are shocked that this possibility has never been considered before in security assessments after 9/11. In particular, security analysts are dismayed that, even after the 9/11 hijackers turned off the transponders to prevent air traffic controllers from identifying the erratic behavior of the aircraft, no steps were taken to make it impossible for anyone on board to turn the transponders off. That remains the case today.

Much of the speculation about the present whereabouts of the aircraft is focused on the empty reaches of the Indian Ocean, based upon indications that the aircraft turned in that direction, where there are very few places for a 777 to land. There have been reports that the pilot, Capt. Zaharie Ahmad Shah, researched remote landing fields capable of handling a Boeing 777 and had a list of six remote airfields where Fight 370 could have landed. Experts identified more than 600 potential landing fields within the aircraft’s range. 

To  build a runway for this aircraft, all it takes is a mile long strip of land.  Level off 4,000 feet of  that strip  with a bulldozer, and put down some gravel. That is all it takes. Officially, Boeing states that the 777-200ER needs 11,100 feet to take off, but Boeing does not stipulate the minimum landing distance, for legal reasons. (If Boeing stipulates a minimum landing distance and someone crashes attempting to land in that distance, lawsuits will ensue.) An unsigned report in FlightGlobal.com on a test flight of a Boeing 777-300ER, which is a bigger, heavier aircraft than Flight 370, took off in 3,280 feet.

Most people are not aware of this, but the Eisenhower Interstate Highway System, used by hundreds of millions of Americans every day, was specifically designed to provide two-mile long straightaways where heavy military aircraft could land upon returning from strike missions over the U.S.S.R. The rationale for this was that military planners feared that U.S. landing fields would have been destroyed by Russian counter strikes, leaving American B-52 bombers nowhere else to land. No B-52 bomber has ever landed on an Interstate, but quite a few civilian aircraft have.

What this makes clear is that there would have been no problems landing the aircraft or taking off again, even from a short airfield. The problem is to find a place to land the aircraft where the local authorities would not arrest the pilot once the plane was on the ground. This scenario may seem far-fetched, but it is now being discussed on CNN, MSNBC and Fox. Planes like the Boeing 777 are equipped with two-way radio devices connecting the aircraft to various resources on the ground.  These devices are wired into the same systems that the autopilot is wired into because some of them report on the status of the autopilot system. One source claims that you can actually “call” this aircraft with a cell phone and exchange information with the on-board computer systems.  These systems are used to conduct remote diagnostics and update the software on the airplane.

At this point, as brutal as it sounds, investigators want to find the wreckage of a crashed aircraft because, if they don’t, there is increasing concern that the plane may show up again someday as a guided missile. If this Boeing 777 could have been reprogrammed from the ground, any other “fly-by-wire” aircraft could also be reprogrammed and flown from wherever the remote  hijackers happened to be.  If that proves true, then there are more important things to worry about than the whereabouts of Flight 370.

By Alan M. Milner

Sources:
CNN