Author Topic: Argentina asks UN to bring UK into talks on Falklands  (Read 4990 times)

nestopwar

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 842
    • View Profile
Argentina asks UN to bring UK into talks on Falklands
« on: February 25, 2010, 07:30:25 AM »
Argentina asks UN to bring UK into talks on Falklands 
 
Jorge Taiana asked Ban Ki-moon to intervene in dispute with UK
Argentina has formally asked United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon to bring the UK into talks over the sovereignty of the Falkland Islands.

Argentine Foreign Minister Jorge Taiana said he had asked Mr Ban to help stop "further unilateral acts" by the UK.

Mr Taiana was referring to the UK's decision to begin oil drilling under a seabed off the islands.

The UK government says the islands have a "legitimate right" to develop an oil industry within their waters.

In a statement, the UK Permanent Representative to the UN, Sir Mark Lyall Grant, said that the UK had "no doubt" over its sovereignty over the Falkland Islands.

He said this position was "underpinned by the principle of self-determination as set out in the UN charter".

After the meeting with Mr Ban, Mr Taiana reiterated his government's belief that the islands, which it calls Las Malvinas, are part of Argentina's territory.

He said he had asked the UN chief to press Britain to at least talk to his country about the dispute.

The BBC's Matthew Price at the UN says that the dispute has as much to do with oil as it does with Argentine politics.

With elections due next year, the government cannot be seen to be dropping the country's claim, especially if oil is found in large quantities, our correspondent says.

Diplomatic offensive

Argentina and the UK went to war over the islands in 1982 after Buenos Aires invaded.

The current Argentine government has ruled out any military action over the islands but is stepping up a diplomatic offensive to try to pressure London into negotiations.

  What is the geographic, the political or economic explanation for England [sic] to be in Las Malvinas?

Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva
Brazilian president


Oil or no oil?
Q&A: The Falklands row 
Buenos Aires says the UK has broken a UN resolution forbidding unilateral development in disputed waters.

A summit of Latin American and Caribbean nations ended in Mexico on Tuesday with a statement reaffirming "backing for Argentina's legitimate rights in its sovereignty dispute with the United Kingdom relating to the 'Malvinas Question'".

The statement also urged the two governments to "renew negotiations in order to find in the shortest time possible a just, peaceful and definitive solution to the dispute".

Explanation

At the summit, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva urged the UN to debate Argentina's claim to sovereignty.

"What is the geographic, the political or economic explanation for England [sic] to be in Las Malvinas?" he asked.

"Could it be because England is a permanent member of the UN's Security Council [where] they can do everything and the others nothing?"

The British-contracted rig Ocean Guardian began drilling 100km (62 miles) north of the Falklands on Monday.

The drilling operation in the disputed waters off the Falkland Islands could yield millions of barrels of oil and the British government says it will take all necessary measures to protect the archipelago.

UK forces wrested back control of the Falkland Islands, held by Britain since 1833, after a seven-week war that killed 649 Argentine and 255 British service personnel.

BBCnews
 

nestopwar

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 842
    • View Profile
Re: Argentina asks UN to bring UK into talks on Falklands
« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2010, 07:42:18 AM »
US refuses to endorse British sovereignty in Falklands oil dispute
Washington refused to endorse British claims to sovereignty over the Falklands yesterday as the diplomatic row over oil drilling in the South Atlantic intensified in London and Buenos Aires and at the UN.

Despite Britain’s close military alliance with the US, the Obama Administration is determined not to be drawn into the issue. It has also declined to back Britain’s claim that oil exploration near the islands is sanctioned by international law, saying that the dispute is strictly a bilateral issue.

Argentina appealed to the UN Secretary-General last night to intervene in the dispute - a move Britain adamantly opposes.

“The Secretary-General knows about the issue. He is not happy to learn that the situation is worsening,” Jorge Taiana, the Argentine foreign minister, said after meeting Ban Ki Moon, the UN chief, in New York.

“We have asked the Secretary-General, within the framework of his good offices, to stress to Britain the need to abstain from further unilateral acts.”

A top UN aide acknowledged, however, that Mr Ban would not be able to mediate because of Britain’s opposition.

Sir Mark Lyall Grant, Britain’s UN ambassador, said: “As British Ministers have made clear, the UK has no doubt about its sovereignty over the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and the Sandwich Islands... We are also clear that the Falkland Islands Government is entitled to develop a hydrocarbons industry within its waters, and we support this legitimate business in Falklands’ territory.”

Senior US officials insisted that Washington’s position on the Falklands was one of longstanding neutrality. This is in stark contrast to the public backing and vital intelligence offered by President Reagan to Margaret Thatcher once she had made the decision to recover the islands by force in 1982.

“We are aware not only of the current situation but also of the history, but our position remains one of neutrality,” a State Department spokesman told The Times.

“The US recognises de facto UK administration of the islands but takes no position on the sovereignty claims of either party.”

President Reagan’s support for Britain in 1982 “irked a lot of people in Latin America”, Kevin Casas-Zamora, a Brookings Institution analyst and former Vice-President of Costa Rica, said. The Obama Administration “is trying to split the difference as much as it can because it knows that coming round to the British position would once again create a lot of ill will in the region”.

British officials in Washington said that they were comfortable with the US response to the dispute so far, but indicated that any American support for the idea of mediated negotiations would not be well received. It was “wholly up to the islanders whether they want mediation or not”, one official said.

Britain had boosted the islands’ defences since the conflict, Sir Mark Stanhope, the First Sea Lord, said last night. “Since 1982 we have built a massive runway. We have emplaced forces on the ground, we have sophisticated early warning systems. It is a completely different package, so to compare the way we dealt with the issues in 1982 with today is nonsense,” he added. “ 
 

nestopwar

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 842
    • View Profile
Re: Argentina asks UN to bring UK into talks on Falklands
« Reply #2 on: February 25, 2010, 07:44:21 AM »
Falklands diplomatic offensive puts UK on back foot
The higher profile the Argentine government has recently managed to give the Falklands/Malvinas dispute reflects the greater support Buenos Aires has over the issue these days.

Following backing for Argentina's claim by the Rio Group of Latin American countries, the matter is being raised by Argentina's foreign minister with UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon.

Of course, the background is completely different today, compared with 1982 when the war over the islands took place.

There has been a democratic revolution across South America and the old antagonisms (especially between Argentina and Chile, which supported Britain in 1982) have died down.

Grandstanding

Despite dismissing it as another round of grandstanding that will lead nowhere, the British government is having to work harder than usual diplomatically to justify its refusal to discuss sovereignty.

Its minister for the region, Chris Bryant, said that Britain had "no doubt about our sovereignty over the Falkland Islands".

"It is underpinned by the principle of democratic self-determination. Falkland Islanders want to remain British," he added.

Earlier, Argentina had imposed a new requirement for shipping to get permission to go from there to the islands.

This was in response to the start of drilling for oil off the Falklands, within the exclusive economic zone claimed by the Falkland Islands government, with the support of the UK.

However, even Argentina says this will not lead to conflict.

'Ridiculous claim'

President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner told the Rio Group meeting in Mexico that the British Foreign Office had "stirred up the spectre of a threat of war from the Argentine Republic".

She continued: "This, I would say, was a ridiculous claim - no, it was a brazen claim because I think that since the return of democracy, few countries have given better evidence than Argentina has that it is a country with a profound commitment to peace."

So, one can rule out an armed conflict, despite the warning of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez that if it came to one, Argentina would not be alone this time.

President Chavez also had some advice for the British monarch: "Queen of England, I'm talking to you. The time for empires is over, haven't you noticed? Return the Malvinas to the Argentine people."

But the Rio Group declaration supporting Argentina does not commit any government to giving Argentina material aid in the dispute, and all the talk there, as well as at the UN, is that the dispute should be solved peacefully.

Argentina has not got very far in the UN beyond an annual call from the decolonisation committee for talks about sovereignty and for a peaceful resolution.

The basic problem remains the same.

Treasure islands?

Argentina claims the islands based on its possession of them before the British takeover of 1833.

Britain rejects this historical claim and bases its own claim on the self-determination of the people living in the islands.

The best effort to get the two countries closer together came in 1995 when, in a joint declaration, both agreed to co-operate in developing oil exploration in the south-west Atlantic.

The agreement broke down when Argentina wanted to expand the co-operation zone across the disputed seas and Britain refused.

In the present atmosphere, it appears unlikely that the declaration could be revived in the event that oil is found in the drilling now under way.

So a flare-up of the dispute can be expected from time to time, with both sides falling back on their entrenched positions.

This has been going on since 1833 and will run and run.

Paul.Reynolds-INTERNET@bbc.co.uk