Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Phil Talbot

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13] 14 15 ... 18
181
General Election 2010 / Re: Campaign Video
« on: April 12, 2010, 07:38:40 PM »
Any old bunch of amateurs could surely do better than the crap that follows (which probably cost them hundreds of thousands more of wasted pounds):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCO-KwYpH0M&feature=player_embedded

(As a 'vision of the future' the Labour advertizing cartoon just depressing isn't it?!)

182
General Election 2010 / Re: Campaign Video
« on: April 11, 2010, 06:05:28 PM »
The late Derek Jarman and the still living (more or less) TheSmiths might
make some useful (albeit) unwitting contributions to our campaign benefit gig (and spin-off video)!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derek_Jarman

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9AlH2oYedfk [TheSmiths,Panic]

184
Thursday 08 April 2010
On this day the mainstream parties managed to spend all day talking  one way or another about 'cuts', without any of them mentioning even the possibility of cutting the Trident mass murder system - which would save billions of pounds of wasted money at a stroke.
And this was on a day when USA and Russia signed what was reported as a significant 'nuclear reduction' pact (which one might have thought might have inspired some 'respectable' mainstream journalist to at least ask the British main party leaders about at least the possibility of cutting Trident).

http://www.cnduk.org/index.php/20100408857/press-releases/global-abolition/cnd-welcomes-new-start-treaty.html

185
General Election 2010 / (Re)Definitions/(Re)Dialectics
« on: April 08, 2010, 02:12:41 AM »
Egs

1. 'Suffragettes'/'Suffragists'

http://www.northallertoncoll.org.uk/history/Suffrage%20website%202/Suffragists%20vs.%20Suffragettes.htm

2. 'Representative Democracy' / 'Participatory Democracy'

...

3. 'Representative' / 'Delegate'

...

187
Some more (potentially discussion widening ...) links for interested/open-minded people ...

http://www.stgreens.greentyne.org.uk/index.html

http://www.swp.org.uk/

http://www.tpuc.org/content/about-us

http://www.counterfire.org/

(no party/group 'endorsement' is intended by my posting of these links, nor 'order-of preference' in the order of the listing ... Phil.T.)

188
Traditions and The Future ... minding gaps ...

One of the 'games' the mainstream seems intent on playing with the election is to remove from it any 'ideological' content ... excepting the bland branded 'neo-corporatism' (or whatever else you might call it) which is the single ideology of the three main parties, and the out-and-out fascism of the BNP (as the 'enemy we can all agree to love to hate').
This 'narrowing of range' of discourse seems a form of 'thought-control'.
The Greens might get an occasional mainstream 'inclusion', but the rest of us are one way or another marginalized - either as 'dangerous radicals' or 'harmless lunatics'.
I don't think it's too much of a conceit to say that in our little small town anti-war group we actually have a broader range of good faith ideologies/belief systems than the so called 'wider mainstream' these days.
And we also have healthy ongoing traditions of real democratic debate/discussion - which isn't just cheap political point-scoring or 'opponent knocking'.
In our own forums and discussions we have often referred back to a phrase 'trenches of ideas' (which I first heard from Cuban friends visiting the area, as I seem to recall).
Sometimes it seems as if digging 'trenches of ideas' is perhaps all you can do when up against forces who are materially richer (but not necessarily culturally so) and more physically powerful.
You plant your 'ideals' like seeds in the ground ... in the belief that future generations will be able to cultivate them when conditions are more favourable for their growth ...
Among the ideas informing the ideological 'seeds' of our little small town anti-war groups are modern Marxism, in various forms, which can trace roots back to Marx and Engels and beyond (to the British 'Digger' tradition etc) ... but also non-Marxist forms of radicalism, including the anti-war anti-imperialist radical liberalism of people like John Bright (scorned and/or ignored by the modern Liberal-Democrats, most of whom have probably not even heard of him) ...
The mainstream does seem to want to exclude serious 'ideological discussion' from this election.
Fortunately the internet is there to fill in the gaps ... and is in fact  already full of 'trenches of ideas' ... including completely free editions of 'classics' of political literature ...

http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/61

http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/7080

And not to mention other as yet unbanned and still read texts of a sort that might be recommended by 'quixotic' modern political characters such as Mr Charvez of South America

http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/2000
 
http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/20

http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/623

189
'Obama, Britain and the age of permanent war'
By John Pilger
New Statesman
26 March 2010

'In the coming election campaign in Britain, the [main party]candidates will refer to this war only to laud "our boys". The candidates are almost identical political mummies, shrouded in the Union Jack and the Stars and Stripes. As Blair demonstrated a mite too eagerly, the British elite love America because America allows them to barrack and bomb the natives and call themselves "partners". We should interrupt their fun.
...

Full Article

http://stopwar.org.uk/content/view/1802/1/

190
General Election 2010 / Re: Up-To-Date British Casualty Figures
« on: April 02, 2010, 04:12:37 PM »
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6951584.stm

BBC Defence Correspondent Caroline Wyatt 'explains' (!) : "In our coverage of Afghanistan, we at BBC News do not generally report the numbers of Taliban or insurgent casualties and fatalities, because there are no reliable or verifiable source figures available."



191
General Election 2010 / Up-To-Date British Casualty Figures
« on: April 01, 2010, 05:23:33 PM »
BBC (as if obeying orders from 'on high') seems to have stopped giving casualty running totals in its TV and radio reports of British troop deaths in Afghanistan. Present figure is 275 or 276 - or even 279 - dead troops according to which source(s) you use.

BBC does have webpage listing all fatalities
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8260060.stm
or
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8579889.stm
Does anyone know of a better source?

192
General Election 2010 / Re: CND online anti-Trident lobby
« on: April 01, 2010, 05:14:09 PM »
Roger wrote: 'One thing is how do you get listed??'

Link to the listing form was in my previous posting
http://www.iparl.com/election-cnd/mailform.php

194
General Election 2010 / Re: Campaign Video
« on: March 28, 2010, 05:09:09 PM »

Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13] 14 15 ... 18